Polyethylene Grass Or Poly Fibre Synthetic Grass
The use of polyethylene as the exclusive component to make synthetic grass renders the grass safe from lead, a problem that has been concerning the synthetic grass industry in recent times. Synthetic grass that has been made from nylon fibers require a lead-based bonding agent in order for the pigment to adhere properly. It is this chemical that breaks down as the grass ages causing the excessive levels of lead dust and creating a health risk. Poly fiber doesn’t require this kind of treatment and so, there is no resultant lead emission.
On the other hand sports synthetic grasses, otherwise known as artificial turf, was almost exclusively made from recycled rubber tires filling a nylon fibered surface. These playing fields are the source of much of the concern, particularly the older artificial turf fields as they are more likely to be breaking down.
Synthetic Grass Testing Results
An investigation in 2007 by the New Jersey Department of health and Senior Services (DHSS) resulted in the testing of lead levels in an old style artificial turf field. The laboratory tests came back with the revelation of high levels of lead in the turf fibers and in the dust from the deterioration of the fibers. Later tests of what is referred to as new generation synthetic turf, those which tend to use polyethylene grass fibers, failed to find these high lead levels.
The good news is that there are a growing number of artificial grass manufacturers entering the market with artificial turf products that are comprised of 100% polyethylene fibers. When used in conjunction with non-rubber infill products such as a thermoplastic product, the health concerns are almost completely answered. The only question that really remains is how these products will perform further down the track because they are so new, it remains to be seen if or how they will break down.
It is gratifying to see the constant push to find improved products to answer the concerns that have been raised about synthetic grass. Not only do polyethylene fibers answer the health concerns but the material is also more beneficial environmentally because it allows the water to drain through just like real grass.
Polyethylene Grass Is Great For Pet Owners
This last fact makes polyethylene grass an ideal synthetic grass solution for pet owners too. Synthetic grass made from nylon fibers have been found to have the problem that they absorb characteristics in pet waste which further results in pet odors being retained. Polyethylene grass removes this problem along with the odors thanks to a combination of the non-porous fibers and infill allowing the animal waste and urine to wash freely through the surface. This also means that there will be limited bacterial growth occurring.
As a brief guide for the cost of synthetic grass made from polyethylene fibers, for residential installations, is around $5.25 to $5.50 per square foot. Naturally this price will vary from one supplier to another but if you’re getting it for around that price you should be safe in the knowledge that the price is competitive relative to the marketplace.
It must be noted that although high levels of lead have not been detected in the new generation synthetic grass fibers, they have not been completely lead-free. Researchers have found some lead, particularly in yellow fibers – often used to mark field boundaries – as well as in some green fibers. Lead levels have also been found in the rubber infill used with some new generation turf. See this related article about Synthetic Grass Infill and Alternatives To Rubber Granules for some new ideas and technological advancements to solve this problem.


May 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
I’m not sure whose blog this is-but what a load of absolute nonsense!
I’m going to refer this to our legal department for review. Clearly you are targeting our advanced nylon technology in this “article” which is rife with absolute nonsense.
For the record- I’m here in California with SYNLawn and our nylon and polyethylene fibers are lead free and completely safe. They’ve always been completely safe.
There were both nylon and polyethylene fibers involved in this alleged “lead controversy”. Most of the companies selling the cheaper sports field products to homeowners and others didn’t even know that their fibers had encapsulated lead chromate in them. Many got caught by surprise as they professed to be lead free, but were not. The idea that it was nylon fibers is absolute nonsense.
The fibers did not contain dangerous soluble lead, they contained safe encapsulated lead chromate. Encapsulated Lead chromate does not “break down” as you suggested, nor does it contribute to the products breaking down. Quite the contrary, it helps them resist breaking down. The reporting in New Jersey was the result of the wrong kind of testing. Even then, no one ever said that the fields contained dangerous levels of lead dust. The lead readings were the result of liquifying the grass in acids and then measuring their total lead content. This same imporper testing method found high levels of lead in fields made from all kinds of fibers.
Proper testing for lead dust has never revealed dangerous levels on any of the fields tested and the CDC basically said, it’s safe- go out an play.
There has never been a time where nylon fibers filled with rubber crumbs were a source of concern- nor do I think there has ever been a time in recent years when products were made or used that way in any large scale. Quite the contrary, it is products made of 100% polyethylene or polypropylene fibers that are filled with tires, sand and other “crumby” alternatives.
How odd that you attempt to describe 100% polyethylene fibers with infill as “next generation turf”. That’s been around for over 10 years and there’s nothing new or next generation about it! It’s the cheapest material to make and it is plagued with issues caused by rubber tire infill or other messy particles that need to be replenished and moved around.
It’s truly humorous that you would suggest that being filled up with tons of particles is somehow going to help it drain pet waste!
The actual next generation products that you should be referring to are either 100% nylon or hybrid products that have heat set nylon thatches and don’t require infill.
These products are so far superior in look and performance to 100% polyethylene slit film or mono-filament that it’s almost impossible not to laugh when you say some of these things.
As to the often repeated nonsense about nylon absorbing things. The amount of absorption that can occur in nylon is minimal and does not in any way contribute to odors as is often suggested by people selling cheaper, lower quality inn-fill products made of polyethylene.
When a liquid is absorbed, it then evaporates. Odors from Urine are caused by uric acid crystals that can build up on the surface of any product- polyethylene or nylon. They need to be washed away and dissolved using an enzyme or bleach and water.
Hint- a product filled with tons of infill has way more surface area for things to stick to and dry on. Moreover, it’s hard to hose off infill and not wash it away! Not to mention the fact that your pet is pooping on it! Think Kitty Litter box full of grass blades!
As to your pricing- not sure what you were referring to. If that is a price for materials only, then that’s absurd. 100% Polyethylene products from major manufacturer’s like SYNLawn sell for about $1.75to $2.59 a foot depending on whether they are monofilament or slit film.
Although such products should generally never be used for landscaping or pet applications, they are typically sold here in California for $7 to $9 on the average with two noted exceptions charging people $14 to $19 a sq. ft. installed.’
The highest quality synthetic landscape grasses available sell fro between $7 to $12 a sq. ft. installed and that’s with absolutely no rubber crumbs, lead free and the most durable, resilient and aesthetically perfect fibers available.
For real information about synthetic landscape grass, contact the experts that make almost all of it. http://www.synlawn.com.
May 8th, 2009 at 2:15 pm
I just want to send an apology out to Justin, who commented on this post yesterday. I meant to approve your comment but it somehow got caught up when I deleted the spam comments around it. If you’re reading Justin and you’d like to submit your comment again, it will be welcome.
May 8th, 2009 at 11:25 pm
Mr. Ruth is not telling the truth on a variety of points here and needs to be called out on it. Its time for the public to know the truth about nylon based synthetic turf and I commend the blogger here for discussing it. Mr. Ruth, you can’t simply come on a site like this and think your threats and lies are going to be tolerated.
First Point:
“There has never been a time where nylon fibers filled with rubber crumbs were a source of concern…” Mr. Ruth is clearly ill informed here or simply lying. All of the lead issues that have been coming up lately in the press are because of synthetic turf products that contain nylon; PERIOD. NONE of the reports, test, or any other research on turf that is 100% polyethylene show any threat of lead exposure. http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/artificialturf.htm.
Here is one of the numerous stories that are coming out http://www.lonestarvarsity.com/?p=2574. this story is about AstroPlay which is a sister company to Synlawn (the company that makes Sylawn also makes Astroplay). All you need to do is Google nylon lead synthetic turf to read more stories like this.
The bottom line is if you have synthetic turf in your yard that contains nylon there is a chance that the weather and excessive use of it might increase the levels of lead and I recommend if the turf is over three years old you have it tested.
Second Point:
Mr. Ruth’s pathetically attempts to attack 100% polyethylene based products as somehow requiring crumb rubber and that all of them are slit film or mono-filament is simply silly. He tries to throw around some industry terms assuming he can pass them off on an unknown public.
In fact, most 100% polyethylene products are actually manufactured in the same way as the nylon products with two blades one as the primary blade and the other as the thatch that he discusses. I suggest that the consumer simply compare the difference between these 100% polyethylene based products against the 100% nylon or 50/50 nylon/poly blended products to see if they see a significant difference.
Third Point:
“As to the often repeated nonsense about nylon absorbing things. The amount of absorption that can occur in nylon is minimal…” I don’t understand his point here actually. He admits that nylon absorbes fluids like water and urine but doesn’t see a problem with it?? 100% polyethylene products have 0% absorption. Why would you go with a product that absorbes urine even if it “minimal”? I know my dog urinates in the same spot all the time, that minimal amount would quickly become a lot!
The bottom line here is that nylon based products have problems and should not be used in any capacity whether it be for yards or fields. That is my opinion that I came to after the excessive research I have done. I recommend you do the same before purchasing synthetic turf.
September 9th, 2009 at 12:14 am
Referring to the synlawn guy and his comments I have to say that we should all feel sorry for the poor souls that purchased synlawn franchises. They are really jammed up with overhead and the likes. This is not the first time this guy has harassed others for making any comments about turf that’s not his. Referring this to you legal dept? Please!! Focus on your business smart guy the rest of us that have a better turf will continue to grow you out of existence.
I bet making that royalty payment every month has to sting huh?